U.S. federal court rejects IIUSA motion on unused EB-5 set-aside visas
The legal relief, filed in August, aimed mainly to prevent the DOS from transferring unused EB-5 vet-aside isas to the Unreserved category.
Read MoreThe legal relief, filed in August, aimed mainly to prevent the DOS from transferring unused EB-5 vet-aside isas to the Unreserved category.
Read MoreAIIA, ALC, and RC Hobbs presented arguments to the U.S. Supreme Court against a “loophole” that prevents litigation in these cases.
Read MorePlaintiffs argue that the fee increase for EB-5 violates the law, specifically a mandate for USCIS to complete a study before raising prices.
Read MoreThe EB-5 industry is resigned to the new prices but continues to question their legality and awaits the results of an ongoing lawsuit.
Read MoreThe regional center has filed a response to the lawsuit by EB5 United over alleged defamatory claims, arguing there is no basis for a case.
Read MoreThey filed before the U.S. Court for the District of Columbia, alleging that the rule governing this time period was unlawful.
Read More